| Course title | |||||
| 研究・開発プランニングⅡ [Research and Development Planning: Ⅱ] | |||||
| Course category | The Professional Degree Program of Industrial Technology and Innovation | Requirement | Credit | 4 | |
| Department | Year | ～ | Semester | YearLong | |
| Course type | YearLong | Course code | 1068658 | ||
| Instructor(s) | |||||
| 和田 正義 [WADA Masayoshi] | |||||
| Facility affiliation | Graduate School of Engineering | Office | afjgxte/L1151 | Email address | |
| Course description |
| With regard to the research project to be proposed, we discuss and report about the academic significance and position, the period of the plan and the size of the budget through surveys of existing technologies, etc. About members of them, members of the laboratory including faculty members We clarify the direction and progress of research direction through a meeting with and learn how to develop R & D plan. |
| Expected Learning |
|
(1) With respect to a given task, we can extensively investigate the conventional technology, deeply consider the contents thereof, and claim the superiority and identity of the research project that we propose. (2) We can divide activity contents into appropriate steps, clarify achievement judgment of each, clarify achievement judgment, and plan R & D activities to carry out while managing toward the goal of research |
| Course schedule |
| In the seminar, progress status of each person is presented in presentation form. Among them, in order to clarify the position and significance of the proposed research plan, to explain by presenting concrete promotion methods etc, based on advice and advice of supervisor and laboratory members, Effectively and efficiently carry out research plan formulation. |
| Prerequisites |
| Students of the research management human resources training program are the target, and students of the technology development practical program can not take courses. |
| Required Text(s) and Materials |
| References |
| Assessment/Grading |
|
The grade is estimated by the level of the presentation and the interim report of the proposal. Evaluation will be determined by the 5-point method. S(90-100): Superior. A(80-89): Good. B(70-79): Fair. C(60-69): Poor, D(0-59): Not Applicable. |
| Message from instructor(s) |
| Course keywords |
| Office hours |
| Remarks 1 |
| Remarks 2 |
| Related URL |
| Lecture Language |
| Japanese |
| Language Subject |
| Last update |
| 2/14/2019 7:49:21 PM |